CARE TO CONTRIBUTE?
TIPS, COMMENTS and QUESTIONS are always welcome (and strictly confidential).
Contact The Daily Caveat via:
Or just
read the feed...
Previous Posts
- New Digs for The Daily Caveat
- Rudolph Elmer on Trial
- Sex By Surprise - Julian Assange Surrenders, Charg...
- Taken Aback By the Government's Insider Trading Pr...
- Corporate Crime Comics
- The Daily Caveat has moved...
- Goldman Sachs (Criminally) Probed
- Goldman Sachs Faces Fraud Charges from the SEC
- German Pensioners Jailed for Kidnapping and Tortur...
- Interfluidity - A Blog You Should KNow
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- August 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
4/06/2009
More Scrutiny for Corporate Monitors
7/18/2008
Corporate Monitorship Reform Bill Hits the House
Corporate Monitorships - Scrutiny Continues to Escalate
Ashcroft to Testify on Monitorship Scandalousnes
Interesting Comments on Corporate Monitorships from NJ Congressman
More Scrutiny for Corporate Monitors
These kinds of sweetheart deals may get a little less sweet if two congressmen have their way.
-- MDT
-- MDT
Labels: Christopher Christie, Corporate Monitorships, John Ashcroft
0 Comments.
Post a Comment
Corporate Monitorship Reform Bill Hits the House
The measure would look to provide more stringent guidelines in how corporate monitorships (which can be highly lucrative arrangements) are selected in deferred prosecution agreements with companies under investigation. The Legal Times blog has further details. For background on some recent and controversial monitorship dust-ups, see here.
4/01/2008
Labels: attorney client privilege, Corporate Monitorships, prosecution guidelines
Corporate Monitorships - Scrutiny Continues to Escalate
Here's nice long form article corporate monitorships and the inherent conflicts of interest that have raised serious eybrows of late, via The National Law Journal and authored by Christopher Gunther and Robert Pollack of Skadden Arps.
-- MDT
2/26/2008
-- MDT
Labels: Corporate Monitorships, monitorships
Ashcroft to Testify on Monitorship Scandalousnes
This is a turn-about for the former Attorney General, who had previously indicated he would not be deigning to comment on type of the sweetheart deals that stand to make his consultancy a cool $50 million. Details in the WaPost.
-- MDT
1/21/2008
-- MDT
Labels: Ashcroft Group, Corporate Monitorships, monitorships
Interesting Comments on Corporate Monitorships from NJ Congressman
Following up on this story, New Jersey Congressional Representative, Bill Pascrell, offers some interesting commentary on the controversial administration of corporate monitorships. Obviously the Jersey ties are strong on this issue, given the recent Ashcroft / Christie matter. Pascrell covers that ground and beyond, offering up a critique of the current system and suggestions for potential reforms. Worth a look.
-- MDT
-- MDT
Labels: Ashcroft Group, Bill Pascrell, Christopher Christie, Corporate Monitorships, DOJ
