The Daily Caveat is written by Michael Thomas, a recovering corporate investigator in the Washington, DC-area.

CARE TO CONTRIBUTE?

TIPS, COMMENTS and QUESTIONS are always welcome (and strictly confidential).

Contact The Daily Caveat via:



Join our mailing list to new posts via email.



Or justrss icon read the feed...


Previous Posts
11/08/2006
Pretexting Strikes Again...Did Allied Capital Hire Investigators to Pilfer Phone Records?
Hedge fund manager David Einhorn, co-founder of Greenlight Capital (and recent World Series of Poker participant) is claiming to have been the victim of a scheme by which someone gained access to his personal phone records.

Einhorn has alleged that investigators used pretextual techniques fool his phone company into sending account activity statements to a third party email address.

As many has four others are making similar claims...and what do these folks have in common? They'd all gotten on the wrong side of Allied Capital, the firm being fingered for ordering the pretexting. Details at the NYT and care of American Public Radio.

-- MDT
5 Comments.
Anonymous Anonymoussaid...
An avowed short alleges a crime without offering a shred of supporting evidence?

Sounds more like market manipulation and yellow journalism strikes again.
That would be FOUR times, actually, wouldn't it? I'm sure all will be told when the details get out. This story is sticking around for a while, I think.

-- MDT
Anonymous Anonymoussaid...
lol @ details. There are no details and no evidence. That a newspaper should drag a company through the mud is appalling. It's all about a short-side hedge fund manager who has sleazoid and a half herb greenberg and a couple of other sleazeball "journalists" who will run with any non-story he plants.

This has been going on for nearly five years. Einhorn made a bad short call and he is too egotistical to admit he was wrong. He should stick to the WSOP, where he is smarter than 99 percent of his opponents (not saying much in that setting).
But what of the telephone records? Or are we to assume that this is a total fabrication on the part of Greenberg, Einhorn and the others? That certainly does not seem to be the case, so there is an interesting mystery there. Whether Allied deserves to be fingered for it or not is a different matter.
Anonymous Anonymoussaid...
>Or are we to assume that this is a total fabrication on the part of Greenberg, Einhorn and the others?<

Hard to say. As an Allied shareholder, I've seen enough episodes of this soap opera to know that the connections between the above-mentioned go well beyond their interest in this one company. I would say these are two or more people who often have one voice. Or, if you like, one leader and multiple followers.

My suspicion is this is an increasingly desperate short-seller trying to ride the pretexting news. What does he have to lose? He's thrown about 100 things against the wall the last few years. Nothing has stuck yet, but what's one more try?

I see The Washington Post is now on the bandwagon. I wonder why they haven't examined the ties between Allied's accusers? Or why the previous federal inquiries have turned up nothing actionable? Or why Allied shareholders and taxpayers like you are funding these investigations that lead to nowhere? Who is requesting them and why? Far more interesting mysteries, there, IMO.
Post a Comment


all content © Michael D. Thomas 2010